Woodpecker

Why users choose Woodpecker over Lemlist?

Woodpecker is over 55% cheaper and does not charge per user, unlike Lemlist

With 98% email deliverability you can be sure that your emails will land in the main inbox, not the spam folder

All premium features included – enjoy adaptive sending, a centralized inbox, unlimited email validation and more at no extra cost

Here’s what Lemlist customers dislike about the tool on G2

‘Lemlist charges per seat’

Lemlist only 3 sending emails per user in its cheapest plan, so as you scale up the price of Lemlist will be greatly multiplied. With Woodpecker however, you can add as many users and email sending accounts as you like, without ever having to pay more. Woodpecker makes scaling up easy, without increasing costs.

‘Horribly expensive’

Lemlist charges extra for essential cold email features like adaptive sending, a centralized inbox and email list validation. All of this is already included in the plan price of Woodpecker and it’s still 58% cheaper than Lemlist.

Compare and see why Woodpecker is the best Lemlist alternative for cold email

Automated emails	Woodpecker	Lemlist
A/B test
If campaigns
Follow-ups in one thread
Built-in email validation	(unlimited)	(200 credit limit)
Timezone detection
Deliverability
Warm-up	FREE
Inbox rotation
Adaptive sending
Deliverability monitor
CRM integrations
Salesforce	via Zapier
Hubspot
Pipedrive
Close	via Zapier	via Zapier
Zoho		via Zapier
Inbox integrations
Sendgrid
Mailgun
Gmail
Microsoft 365		via Zapier
Microsoft Exchange		via Zapier
Integrations
Google Sheets		via Zapier
Calendly		via Zapier
Uplead
Leadfuze
Leadpresso
Hunter		via Zapier
Bouncer
Zoom	via Zapier	via Zapier
InvoiceBerry
Teamwork & security
Centralized inbox		on higher plans
GDPR compliance
Duplicate detection
Empty custom fields detection
Team colaboration		on higher plans
Shared contacts & campaigns		on higher plans
API aggregators
Wordpress
Zapier
LeadsBridge
Make

Lemlist is a good option for LinkedIn outreach but not cold emailing

Lemlist doesn’t offer key features for cold email

Lemlist lacks many important features for safe and smooth cold emailing like adaptive sending, which automatically detects email provider’s sending limits or a centralized inbox (only available on higher plans), where all emails can be easily managed from one place. Woodpecker includes both of these features at no extra cost.

Lemlist offers built-in LinkedIn automation

Lemlist focuses more on multichannel outreach. You can add actions such as viewing profiles or sending connection requests. It also includes an option of scraping emails straight from LinkedIn, so if you’re looking for a LinkedIn outreach tool, Lemlist can be a good option to consider.

Lemlist doesn’t focus on email deliverability

Lemlist lacks advanced deliverability features like bounce protection and adaptive sending which are crucial if you want to maintain a high sender reputation and deliver your emails to the main inbox and not the spam folder. Woodpecker includes all of these features at no extra cost.

Lemlist wasn’t made for safe cold emailing, and that’s okay because Woodpecker was

Woodpecker includes all key cold email features in the base plan. Lemlist charges extra for them on more expensive plans