{"id":3948,"date":"2026-02-24T13:49:39","date_gmt":"2026-02-24T12:49:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/?p=3948"},"modified":"2026-06-23T08:48:42","modified_gmt":"2026-06-23T07:48:42","slug":"cold-email-statistics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/","title":{"rendered":"Cold Email Statistics Based on Sending Over 20M Cold Emails (2026 Benchmarks)"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">TL;DR:<\/span><\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Average cold email open rate:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> 27.7%\u201344% depending on source and Apple MPP inflation<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Average cold email reply rate:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> 3.43% platform-wide; 5\u201310% is &#8220;good&#8221;; 10%+ is excellent<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Advanced personalization reply rate:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> up to 18% vs. ~9% for basic templates<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Follow-up impact:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> 42% of all replies come from follow-ups \u2014 48% of reps never send one<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Optimal sequence length:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> 4\u20137 touchpoints; campaigns with 3\u20135 steps hit 8.3% reply rates<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Smaller lists win:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> campaigns under 50 recipients average 5.8% reply rate vs. 2.1% for 1,000+<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Over the years, Woodpecker has grown faster than we predicted \u2014 to 1,000+ customers across 52 countries. More importantly for this article, we&#8217;ve sent well over 20 million sales emails through the platform. That&#8217;s a statistically meaningful dataset.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">We can say that cold email in 2026 is not dead, it&#8217;s just less forgiving. The average platform-wide reply rate has declined from 5.1% in 2024 to <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/instantly.ai\/cold-email-benchmark-report-2026\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">3.43%<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> in 2026 \u2014 driven by inbox saturation, tighter Gmail and Outlook spam enforcement and a flood of low-effort AI-generated outreach.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">But B2B campaigns that run it as a system \u2014 tight targeting, genuine personalization, structured follow-ups \u2014 are regularly hitting 10\u201318% reply rates. The gap between average and elite has never been wider.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">These cold email statistics can be summed into five principles. You don&#8217;t have to follow them rigidly. Every contact group responds differently and you know your prospects best. But the data below should make you more willing to experiment and find what actually works.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Key Findings About Effective Cold Emails<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Here are the most important cold email benchmarks for 2026, drawn from Woodpecker&#8217;s own data and cross-referenced against major external studies.<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Open rate<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Average: 27.7%\u201344%*<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Good: 40\u201360%<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Excellent: 65%+<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Reply rate<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Average: 3.43%<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Good: 5\u201310%<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Excellent: 10%+<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Bounce rate<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Average: 5.1%<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Good: Below 2%<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Excellent: Below 1.5%<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Personalized reply rate<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Average: 18%<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Non-personalized reply rate<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Average: Approximately 9%<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Sequence reply rate with 4\u20137 steps<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Average: 8.3%<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Sequence reply rate with no follow-ups<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Average: 4.1%<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Small-list reply rate with fewer than 50 contacts<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Average: 5.8%<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Large-list reply rate with 1,000 or more contacts<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Average: 2.1%<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Open rate figures vary significantly because Apple Mail Privacy Protection (MPP) pre-loads tracking pixels, inflating reported opens. Treat average open rate as a directional signal, not a precise KPI in email outreach. Focus optimization effort on reply rate.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Double Your Email Reply Rate with Advanced Personalization<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When we analyzed our data, the pattern was unambiguous: personalization has a massive effect on reply rate \u2013\u00a0 in cold outreach and email marketing in general. That rate tells you how many of your cold email recipients wrote back.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>The numbers from our dataset, confirmed by 2026 external benchmarks:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Emails with advanced personalization (custom snippets beyond <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">{{first_name}}<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> or <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">{{company_name}}<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 referencing a prospect&#8217;s article, a recent company hire, a funding round, a specific pain point) achieve an average reply rate of ~17\u201318%<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Emails with basic or no personalization average around 7\u20139%<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">That&#8217;s roughly a 2x difference, driven entirely by the depth of research behind the message.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The 2026 context makes this more important, not less. AI-generated outreach has flooded inboxes with messages that look personalized but aren&#8217;t. Prospects can increasingly distinguish between a real research-backed email and an AI merge. Only 5% of cold email senders personalize every email \u2014 and those who do get <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/martal.ca\/b2b-cold-email-statistics-lb\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">2\u20133x<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> better results.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Personalization also influences deliverability. Custom snippets make each copy unique across your campaign \u2014 reducing the chance that identical messages trigger spam filters.<\/span><\/p>\n<h4><b>What you can do about it<\/b><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Include around 3 custom snippets per email that draw on something genuinely specific: a recent article they wrote, a company milestone, a product update, a mutual connection. Reference only public, easy-to-find information. There&#8217;s a clear line between research-backed personalization and coming across as intrusive \u2014 stay on the right side of it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For personalization at scale, check Woodpecker&#8217;s guide on<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email\/mail-merge-custom-fields\/\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">using custom fields in cold email campaigns<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A High-Quality List of Contacts Makes Your Deliverability &amp; Email Reply Rate Skyrocket<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Together with personalization, email addresses list quality is the most influential factor in reply rate. The data is consistent across every major 2026 benchmark report.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Consider two campaigns:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Campaign A:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> 1,000 prospects, no personalization, generic copy \u2192 <\/span><b>~2% reply rate<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> = 20 replies\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Campaign B:<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> 100 targeted, well-researched prospects, personalized copy \u2192 <\/span><b>up to 18% reply rate<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> = 18 replies<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The reply counts are nearly identical \u2014 but Campaign B gets there with 10x fewer emails, less infrastructure load, less spam risk and a higher proportion of <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">positive<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> replies. Scaling Campaign B model is what separates elite senders from average ones.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The 2026 data reinforces this clearly: verified email lists achieve roughly <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cleanlist.ai\/blog\/2026-02-18-cold-email-response-rate-statistics\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">2x the reply rate<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> of unverified lists and campaigns targeting fewer than 50 recipients average <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cleverly.co\/blog\/cold-email-benchmarks-by-industry\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5.8% reply rate<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 nearly three times the 2.1% seen in large blasts.<\/span><\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What you can do to drive more positive replies<\/span><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Create smaller campaigns where all contacts share a clear common denominator \u2014 same industry, company size, tech stack, hiring signal or growth trigger. The tighter the segment, the easier it is to write copy that lands.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A concrete targeting example: instead of &#8220;software companies worldwide,&#8221; search for &#8220;SaaS companies in the UK, 50\u2013200 employees, using HubSpot, that raised a Series A in the last 12 months.&#8221; Each campaign should have one shared pain point you can speak to directly.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Take care of your online presence too. Prospects Google you before replying. Keep your LinkedIn, website and social profiles current. Prepare social proof and referrals. The first reply is often conditional on what they find when they look you up.<\/span><\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What to do when you&#8217;re seeing a lot of negative replies<\/span><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Check your follow-up intervals first. Too frequent, too regular or too many follow-ups reads as pressure. Make intervals varied and space them out.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Then look at your copy. Read it as if you&#8217;re the recipient. Strip salesy language. Focus on them, not your product. If you&#8217;ve borrowed a template from the internet, throw it out \u2014 templates that circulate widely get pattern-matched by both spam filters and human readers. Write in your own voice.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Maximize Your Open Rate by Narrowing Down Outreach the Target Group<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Open rate measures how many of the prospects who received your email actually opened it. It&#8217;s worth monitoring \u2014 but in 2026, it needs important context before you benchmark against it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Apple MPP problem: Apple Mail Privacy Protection, now accounting for roughly 49% of all email opens, pre-loads tracking pixels automatically. This means a large portion of reported &#8220;opens&#8221; represent a bot-triggered pixel load, not a human reading your email. Open rates are a directional signal in 2026 \u2014 not a precise performance measure.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>What the data actually shows:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Platform-wide average cold email open rate: 27.7% (Snov.io, widely cited across 2026 benchmarks)<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Good open rate: 40\u201360% for properly authenticated domains with verified lists<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Elite campaigns: 65%+, driven by deliverability infrastructure and subject line precision<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In Woodpecker&#8217;s data, campaigns consistently achieve strong open rates when three factors align:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>narrow targeting,\u00a0<\/b><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>small prospect base per campaign,\u00a0<\/b><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>and clean deliverability infrastructure<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (SPF, DKIM, DMARC, warmed domain, bounce rate under 2%).<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A high open rate with no replies still means your campaign failed. A 96% open rate with a misleading subject line that doesn&#8217;t match your email&#8217;s content is a common spammer tactic that poisons your domain reputation. Reply rate is the metric that actually matters.<\/span><\/p>\n<h4><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What you can do about it<\/span><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Take care of email deliverability first \u2014 emails that don&#8217;t reach the inbox can&#8217;t be opened. Then focus on a<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email\/what-subject-line-will-make-my-addresses-open-my-cold-email\/\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">compelling subject line<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> that is honest about what&#8217;s inside. Polish your<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email\/from-line\/\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&#8220;From:&#8221; line<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and the first sentence of your email \u2014 both are visible in the preview pane before anyone opens.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In 2026, avoid subject lines that signal AI authorship \u2014 phrases like &#8220;Quick question for you&#8221; or &#8220;Thought this might be useful&#8221; have been overused enough that they now read as automation, not human outreach. Specific, contextual subject lines outperform generic curiosity bait every time.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Write a Campaign to Fewer, Carefully-Chosen Contacts to Boost Cold Email Reply Rate<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Our data shows clearly: <\/span><b>the fewer prospects in a campaign, the higher the reply rate<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 when that smaller list is also better-targeted. There&#8217;s roughly a 10% difference in reply rate between campaigns targeting 1\u2013200 prospects versus 1,000+.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The 2026 benchmark from Belkins&#8217; analysis of 16.5 million emails mirrors this: campaigns under 50 recipients average 5.8% reply rate versus 2.1% for campaigns with 500+ recipients. That gap has widened as spam filters have gotten more sophisticated and as AI-blast volume has driven inbox fatigue upward.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This isn&#8217;t magic \u2014 it&#8217;s math and attention. A smaller, tighter list makes personalization faster, copy easier to tailor and every follow-up more relevant.<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Under 50 contacts<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Average reply rate: 5.8%<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Source note: Belkins analysis of 16.5 million emails<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>50\u2013200 contacts<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Average reply rate: Approximately 4\u20135%<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Source note: Woodpecker internal data<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>200\u2013500 contacts<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Average reply rate: Approximately 3%<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Source note: Industry aggregate<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>500\u20131,000+ contacts<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Average reply rate: 2.1%<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Source note: Belkins and Cleverly<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What you can do about it<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When building a list of prospects, don&#8217;t just look for companies in the same broad field. Define a specific set of criteria: industry, company size, geography, tech stack, recent trigger event (new funding, new hire, product launch). &#8220;SaaS companies from Germany using Salesforce&#8221; is actionable. &#8220;Software companies worldwide&#8221; isn&#8217;t.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This precision also makes snippet research faster \u2014 when everyone in a campaign shares a common denominator, you&#8217;re not starting from scratch on each message.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Write More Follow-Ups to Boost Cold Email Reply Rate and Conversion Rate<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">This is the most consistent finding across every major 2026 data source and the most consistently ignored.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>The numbers:<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">58% of all replies come from the first email in a sequence<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">42% of all replies come from follow-up steps \u2014 meaning a one-touch campaign abandons nearly half its potential responses<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">48% of sales reps never send a follow-up after the first email goes unanswered<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Campaigns with 3\u20135 follow-up steps hit 8.3% reply rates vs. 4.1% for sequences without any follow-ups<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A single follow-up added to a sequence increases total replies by 65.8%<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The first follow-up peak reply rate is 8.4% (Belkins data) \u2014 often higher than the first email itself<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">(Sources:<\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/instantly.ai\/cold-email-benchmark-report-2026\"> <i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Instantly 2026 Benchmark Report<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/www.saleshandy.com\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/\"> <i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Saleshandy Cold Email Statistics 2026<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">;<\/span><\/i><a href=\"https:\/\/www.yourmarketingbowl.com\/blog-post\/cold-email-statistics\"> <i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">YourMarketingBowl 2026<\/span><\/i><\/a><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">)<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The optimal sequence length in 2026 is <\/span><b>4\u20137 touchpoints<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. Under four and you&#8217;re giving up before capturing the follow-up replies. Beyond seven and returns diminish unless each touch adds genuinely new value.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Follow-up reply rates by step (Belkins data):<\/b><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>First email<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reply rate: 3.43% on average<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Note: Generates 58% of all replies.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>First follow-up<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reply rate: 8.4%<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Note: The highest-performing individual step.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Second follow-up<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reply rate: An additional 3%<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Note: Adds an incremental lift to the campaign.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Third follow-up<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reply rate: Not specified<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Note: Returns begin to diminish at this stage.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><b>Fourth follow-up and beyond<\/b><b><br \/>\n<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Reply rate: Not specified<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"><br \/>\n<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Note: The risk of spam complaints and unsubscribes triples.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What you can do to increase reply rate with following up<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Work on timing first. Avoid identical intervals \u2014 sending a follow-up every day at the same time reads as automation. Use varied timing: first follow-up 3\u20134 days after the initial email, second 5\u20137 days later, third 7\u201310 days after that.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Every follow-up should add something new: a relevant industry stat, a case study, a different angle on your value proposition or a reference to something that&#8217;s changed in their world since your last email. The worst-performing follow-up phrase in 2026 is &#8220;just checking in&#8221; \u2014 it signals no new value, reduces meetings booked by <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.saleshandy.com\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">14%<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and trains spam filters.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">For practical follow-up frameworks, see<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email\/follow-up-emails-how-many-how-often\/\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">how many follow-ups to send and how often<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> and<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email\/what-should-my-follow-up-email-look-like\/\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">what a strong follow-up email looks like<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Experiment in 2026: Send Cold Emails and See What Works<\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">No benchmark report \u2014 including this one \u2014 tells you exactly what works for your specific product and market. What it gives you is a starting point.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The single biggest difference between average cold email campaigns and elite ones isn&#8217;t budget or technology \u2014 it&#8217;s <\/span><b>testing cadence<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Average teams write a sequence, launch it and optimize follow-ups. Elite teams test 10 variations of the first email, identify the winner and then build the sequence around it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The principles from Woodpecker&#8217;s data \u2014 personalize deeply, target tightly, follow up consistently, keep emails under 80 words \u2014 are validated by every major 2026 benchmark study. But your list will have its own quirks. Test subject lines. Test openers. Test CTA phrasing. Test send timing. Measure at the reply level, not just opens.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To dig into your own campaigns:<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/app.woodpecker.co\/login\"> <span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">log into your Woodpecker account<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, review campaigns by reply rate and identify the common patterns in your best and worst performers.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FAQ<\/span><\/h2>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What Is the Average Response Rate for Cold Emails?<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The platform-wide average cold email response rate in 2026 is <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/instantly.ai\/cold-email-benchmark-report-2026\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">3.43%<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, based on Instantly&#8217;s benchmark analysis of billions of cold email interactions. A response rate above 5% is considered good, 10%+ is excellent. Well-targeted campaigns with advanced personalization regularly achieve 17\u201318%. Below 1% signals a fundamental problem with list quality, deliverability or messaging.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">How Important Are Personalized Subject Lines in Cold Emails?<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Very important \u2014 but the specificity of the personalization matters more than the act of personalization itself. Emails with advanced personalization (industry-specific pain points, recent triggers, company news) achieve reply rates of <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/martal.ca\/b2b-cold-email-statistics-lb\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">17\u201318%<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, roughly double the 7\u20139% average for basic or non-personalized emails. Customized subject lines improve open rates by up to 50% and numbers in subject lines increase open rates by 113% on average.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What Are Some Effective Cold Email Subject Lines?<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Effective cold email subject lines in 2026 are specific, honest about email content and reference something directly relevant to the recipient \u2014 their company, a recent event, a visible problem. Question-format subject lines lift open rates by ~21%. The key 2026 warning: avoid subject lines that sound AI-generated (&#8220;Quick question,&#8221; &#8220;Thought this might be useful&#8221;) \u2014 they are now overused enough to signal automation rather than genuine outreach.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">How Can I Improve My Cold Email Response Rates?<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The highest-leverage improvements, in order of impact: (1) List quality \u2014 verify emails, target tightly, keep bounce rate under 2%; (2) Deliverability \u2014 proper SPF, DKIM, DMARC, warmed sending domain; (3) Personalization depth \u2014 go beyond first name to context-specific snippets; (4) Follow-ups \u2014 a single follow-up increases replies by 65.8%; (5) Email length \u2014 under 80 words with a single clear CTA outperforms longer formats. These factors together can move a campaign from the 3.43% average to 10%+.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What Is the Role of a Call to Action in Cold Emails?<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The CTA determines what happens next \u2014 and low-friction, specific CTAs significantly outperform vague ones. Instantly&#8217;s winning CTA format for 2025\u20132026 was: <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&#8220;Would you have a couple of minutes to chat about this over the next few days?&#8221;<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> \u2014 conversational, specific, easy to say yes to. Avoid multi-step asks in the first email. One ask, one sentence, two time-window options if scheduling a call.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">How Many Follow-Up Emails Should I Send After an Initial Cold Email?<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The optimal sequence in 2026 is 4\u20137 touchpoints total (including your first email). Campaigns with 3\u20135 follow-up steps hit 8.3% reply rates versus 4.1% for no follow-ups. The first follow-up alone peaks at 8.4% reply rate \u2014 often the highest single-step performance in the sequence. After four follow-ups, spam and unsubscribe risk triples. Space follow-ups 3\u20137 days apart and add new value in each touch.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What Is the Impact of Long Subject Lines on Cold Email Performance?<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Shorter subject lines remain stronger, but the data is more nuanced in 2026. Subject lines of 36\u201350 characters achieve the best response rates. Lines of 6\u201310 words perform well on mobile (which cuts off after ~43 characters). Backlinko&#8217;s 12-million-email study found longer subject lines yielded 24.6% higher response rates in some segments \u2014 suggesting the right answer is to test for your audience rather than follow a universal rule.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">What Is the Typical Unsubscribe Rate for Cold Email Campaigns?<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A healthy unsubscribe rate is below 2%. Gmail now enforces a spam complaint threshold of under 0.1% for bulk senders \u2014 exceeding it leads to active rejection, not just spam filtering. A high unsubscribe rate typically signals poor targeting, excessive frequency or copy that fails to deliver the value your subject line promised.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">How Much Time Do Sales Reps Spend Writing Cold Emails?<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">A significant share \u2014 some estimates suggest up to a third of outreach time is spent on email composition. In 2026, the shift is visible in platform data: elite outbound teams now use AI for roughly 80% of research and sequencing work, freeing human effort for messaging strategy, personalization decisions and live reply handling. The teams that over-rely on AI for the writing itself see declining reply rates \u2014 AI-detectable copy is being filtered out both by spam systems and by skeptical prospects.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over the span of 2 years, Woodpecker has grown a lot faster than we\u2019ve predicted. We have 1000+ customers on board who come from 52 different countries. But what\u2019s more important for today\u2019s blog post, Woodpecker has sent way more than 20 million sales emails throughout all this time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":9211,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.11 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Cold Email Statistics Based on Sending Over 20M Cold Emails<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Updated 2026 cold email statistics from 20M+ emails sent through Woodpecker: covering open rates, reply rates, conversion rates, follow-up benchmarks.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cold Email Statistics Based on Sending Over 20M Cold Emails\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Updated 2026 cold email statistics from 20M+ emails sent through Woodpecker: covering open rates, reply rates, conversion rates, follow-up benchmarks.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Woodpecker Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/business.facebook.com\/woodpeckerapp\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-02-24T12:49:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-06-23T07:48:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/app\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Cold_Email_Statistics_Based_on_Sending_Over_20M_Cold_Emails_3.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"650\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"391\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Margaret Sikora\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@woodpeckerapp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@woodpeckerapp\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Margaret Sikora\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/dbd5fae1eeb41a0caf2e2c7bda48059f\"},\"headline\":\"Cold Email Statistics Based on Sending Over 20M Cold Emails (2026 Benchmarks)\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-24T12:49:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-23T07:48:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/\"},\"wordCount\":2620,\"commentCount\":4,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Cold email basics\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/\",\"name\":\"Cold Email Statistics Based on Sending Over 20M Cold Emails\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-02-24T12:49:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-06-23T07:48:42+00:00\",\"description\":\"Updated 2026 cold email statistics from 20M+ emails sent through Woodpecker: covering open rates, reply rates, conversion rates, follow-up benchmarks.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Woodpecker Blog\",\"description\":\"Woodpecker Blog - Pro Tips on Cold Emails, Follow-ups, Sales &amp; Growth\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Woodpecker.co\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/app\/uploads\/2015\/06\/WP_Logo_WersjaPodstawowa_Pionowa_CzarneTlo_RGB.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/app\/uploads\/2015\/06\/WP_Logo_WersjaPodstawowa_Pionowa_CzarneTlo_RGB.jpg\",\"width\":1240,\"height\":874,\"caption\":\"Woodpecker.co\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/business.facebook.com\/woodpeckerapp\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/woodpeckerapp\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/woodpeckerapp\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/woodpecker-co\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCNN9wM55yaNI-KEZCfh66_A\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/dbd5fae1eeb41a0caf2e2c7bda48059f\",\"name\":\"Margaret Sikora\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/285df23338966e859f136eed9706c0a6?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/285df23338966e859f136eed9706c0a6?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Margaret Sikora\"},\"description\":\"Product Manager and DPO at Woodpecker. A lawyer who gets the SaaS business, understands customers' needs, and speaks the language of IT guys.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/margaretsikora\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/margaret.sikora.official\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/author\/gosia-sikora\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cold Email Statistics Based on Sending Over 20M Cold Emails","description":"Updated 2026 cold email statistics from 20M+ emails sent through Woodpecker: covering open rates, reply rates, conversion rates, follow-up benchmarks.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cold Email Statistics Based on Sending Over 20M Cold Emails","og_description":"Updated 2026 cold email statistics from 20M+ emails sent through Woodpecker: covering open rates, reply rates, conversion rates, follow-up benchmarks.","og_url":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/","og_site_name":"Woodpecker Blog","article_publisher":"https:\/\/business.facebook.com\/woodpeckerapp","article_published_time":"2026-02-24T12:49:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-06-23T07:48:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":650,"height":391,"url":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/app\/uploads\/2020\/07\/Cold_Email_Statistics_Based_on_Sending_Over_20M_Cold_Emails_3.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Margaret Sikora","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@woodpeckerapp","twitter_site":"@woodpeckerapp","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/"},"author":{"name":"Margaret Sikora","@id":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/dbd5fae1eeb41a0caf2e2c7bda48059f"},"headline":"Cold Email Statistics Based on Sending Over 20M Cold Emails (2026 Benchmarks)","datePublished":"2026-02-24T12:49:39+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-23T07:48:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/"},"wordCount":2620,"commentCount":4,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Cold email basics"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/","url":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/","name":"Cold Email Statistics Based on Sending Over 20M Cold Emails","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-02-24T12:49:39+00:00","dateModified":"2026-06-23T07:48:42+00:00","description":"Updated 2026 cold email statistics from 20M+ emails sent through Woodpecker: covering open rates, reply rates, conversion rates, follow-up benchmarks.","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/cold-email-statistics\/"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/","name":"Woodpecker Blog","description":"Woodpecker Blog - Pro Tips on Cold Emails, Follow-ups, Sales &amp; Growth","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#organization","name":"Woodpecker.co","url":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/app\/uploads\/2015\/06\/WP_Logo_WersjaPodstawowa_Pionowa_CzarneTlo_RGB.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/app\/uploads\/2015\/06\/WP_Logo_WersjaPodstawowa_Pionowa_CzarneTlo_RGB.jpg","width":1240,"height":874,"caption":"Woodpecker.co"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/business.facebook.com\/woodpeckerapp","https:\/\/twitter.com\/woodpeckerapp","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/woodpeckerapp\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/woodpecker-co\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCNN9wM55yaNI-KEZCfh66_A"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/dbd5fae1eeb41a0caf2e2c7bda48059f","name":"Margaret Sikora","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/285df23338966e859f136eed9706c0a6?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/285df23338966e859f136eed9706c0a6?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Margaret Sikora"},"description":"Product Manager and DPO at Woodpecker. A lawyer who gets the SaaS business, understands customers' needs, and speaks the language of IT guys.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/margaretsikora\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/margaret.sikora.official"],"url":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/author\/gosia-sikora\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3948"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/17"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3948"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3948\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50571,"href":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3948\/revisions\/50571"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9211"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3948"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/woodpecker.co\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}